Tuesday, August 22, 2006

So Let Me Get This Straight

I normally attempt to avoid the tabloid style fascination with the goings-on in Hollywood. It is my personal conviction that if everyone focused more on their stock portfolio or their children and less on the endless litany of self-indulgent celebrity freaks, society would be much better off. It would seem that a majority of people pay these idiots to live a lavish lifestyle on their behalf.

The L.A. Times editorial Shun Mel Gibson managed, however, to catch my attention. They are calling for Hollywood to relegate Margarita Mel to celebrity z-list status:
“The stages of Gibson's well-scripted redemption — rehab, repentance, a newfound appreciation for the horrors of the Holocaust — are painfully predictable. We only wish its supporting cast would refuse to do their part, and allow Gibson to continue ranting, or make his peace with the world, off camera.”

I’m not here to defend Mel Gibson’s actions. What he did was stupid and reprehensible. My problem lies with the Champagne Socialists that make up the L.A. Times. You can never predict what is going to get them so worked up that their half-cap double milk lattes wind up getting spilled all over their beloved 7 series Bimmers. These folks are willing to send Mel Gibson, a reported alcoholic, to the woodchipper without any calls for redemption. However, Tookie Williams, one of the top guns of L.A.’s notorious Crips gets doted on by the Times with all of the accolades befitting Mother Theresa.

Notable verse from the Times on Mr. Williams include:
“Stanley Tookie Williams, whose self-described evolution from gang thug to antiviolence crusader won him an international following and nominations for a Nobel Peace Prize, was executed by lethal injection early today, hours after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger refused to spare his life.”

A fawning opening paragraph with no mention of the four people he murdered or his vehement refusal right up to his execution to help the police make inroads against the Crips. Headings around the time of Tookie’s execution also include such gems as:
Austria Feels Sense of Betrayal by Native Son

When the L.A. Times takes a harder line on you than on a convicted murderer who is also one of gangland’s founding fathers, you know you are up chocolate creek without a popsicle stick.

4 Comments:

At 12:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Champaign socialists, eh. I think you've been reading too many American right wing extremist web sites and blogs like http://www.horsesass.org.

Why don't you just be you and write the way you would if you were talking to a group of people you didn't know?

You started that way, and it was interesting reading. If all you want out of blogging is to be just another Conservative clone using American buzzwords and someone else's ideas, let me know and I'll stop reading.

 
At 8:04 AM, Blogger Unapologetic Ex-Winnipegger said...

I hold the right wing nutters in the same esteem that I hold Limousine Liberals and Champagne Socialists. My views on gay marriage and abortion would make the former blow a cerebral gasket. I can't even bring myself to read Ann Coulter's sensationalisic drivel in the Sun so forgive me if I lack familiarity with the sites that you suggest I fervently read.

Sorry Harry, I'm not taking back my "American" buzzwords. In fact, I'll add another one - Compassionate Condescension - it's when you feel sorry for someone you also look down upon. This brand of politics is well practised by the Front Street Latte Leftie crowd. I've spent enough time in Toronto and many other Canadian cities to meet my fair share of them. Social and political opportunists exist in ALL parties regardless of political stripe.

My point continues to be that these learned individuals have a double standard when it comes to meting out justice. Maybe a subscription to the L.A. Times includes a super secret social justice decoder ring to help their readers follow the paper's reasoning.

Let me put the onus back on you - I would expect a much more erudite repudiation of my assertions from you. If you disagree with me, please counter my tenets without resorting to the "rabid rightie Ammerican" dismissal.

 
At 12:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You expect a what? Run that one by me again using a language I'm familiar with - LOL.

Actually it wasn't a case of being in agreement or disagreement with the contents of your article.

I was tired, cranky, and should have just left it alone, or at least indicated that it wasn't really intended for a blog comment since I know you have moderation turned on, and was a comment (criticism?) on style.

Sorry for coming across in a less than helpful or positive way.

Regards

 
At 5:47 PM, Blogger Unapologetic Ex-Winnipegger said...

No problem - feel free to vent anytime. As both of our blogs develop, I expect us to engage in some interesting banter. I hope you likewise don't take offence when my opinions diverge from your blog musings...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home