Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Show ME the Money, Gary

The NDP released their results for the plebiscite on the Canadian Wheat Board today. Is anyone surprised to find that 70% of farmers voted to keep the single desk for wheat and that 62% decided to keep the single desk for barley? I expect our BBA friends to be posting shortly, gloating with all manners of “I told you so!” being volleyed about. Here is my response to the blog entry they haven’t written but are no doubt typing right now.

The most important number to look at in this analysis is the participation rate. Everyone knew going in that this was a symbolic vote meant to embarrass Harper & McFadyen on the cusp of a provincial vote, I mean, garner the opinion of farmers. Of all the farmers that could have voted on this matter, only 65% elected to do so.

If I were to hazard a guess as to who would be most likely to fully participate in the poll, I would assume it would be those farmers in support of the single desk. After all, the ones in favour of marketing choice are getting what they want so what is their incentive to participate in an essentially meaningless survey? That means 70% of 65% of farmers support the Wheat Board. This in turn represents only 45.5% of farmers overall, i.e. a minority.

We already knew that there was roughly 46% support for a status quo CWB going into this plebiscite. It is heartening to find that the NDP saw fit to waste $80,000.00 (let’s add this to the running tab on Spirited Energy and Manitoba Means Business) on the obvious conclusion. Why didn’t they just give the money to me? I gave the same numbers here a little while back. Next time, just give me the money and read my blog – I promise to spend the money in-province. Well, most of it anyways – Mrs. P&UW has been wanting a Vegas vacation lately…

5 Comments:

At 7:17 PM, Blogger The Hack said...

Do we know how many ballots went out?

 
At 9:55 PM, Blogger Unapologetic Ex-Winnipegger said...

The article said 11,371 farmers were eligible to vote. With a 65% response rate, that's 7,391 votes cast.

I was amazed at the low participation rate for the election of directors, at 40-50%. A past commenter mentioned that the directors were voting based on the wishes of farmers. How can directors purport to know the wishes of all farmers if 50-60% are opting out of the democratic process?

 
At 12:15 PM, Blogger Unapologetic Ex-Winnipegger said...

You can't advance the argument that directors are acting in the interests of farmers if not even half of the eligible voters are casting a ballot for said representatives. They are advancing the interests of those willing to be politically engaged, maybe.

I would be interested to see why the participation rates are so low. If there are any farmers in this crowd, how's about sharing your thoughts. If you haven't been voting, why?

 
At 1:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't forget many of the so-called farmers that got ballots are not farming anymore.

 
At 2:25 PM, Blogger Unapologetic Ex-Winnipegger said...

So you are saying there are even MORE credibility issues with the plebiscite? Looks like this 70% is on pretty wobbly ground.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home